Log in

Patent Information Users Group, Inc.

The International Society for Patent Information Professionals

Log in

United Patents Webinar: Proving Up Printed Publication Status in a Pandemic (June 25, 2020, 12:00p EST)

  • 23 Jun 2020 5:49 PM
    Message # 9055686
    Unified Patents Webinar: June 25, 2020, 12:00 pm-1:00 pm EST

    Proving Up Printed Publication Status in a Pandemic

    We will discuss how to establish a reasonable likelihood that a non-patent document qualifies as a printed publication in IPR proceedings in view of the Board's precedential opinion in Hulu, LLC v. Sound View Innovations, LLC, IPR2018-01039, Paper 29 (PTAB Dec. 20, 2019).  We will also look at the challenges of obtaining evidence of public accessibility of documents posed by the pandemic and discuss possible ways to address this issue.

    Speaker: Jung Hahm – Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents

    Jason Skinder – Chief IP Counsel, Connected Enterprises, Honeywell                       

    Raghav Bajaj – Partner, Haynes and Boone

    A registration link

    Note: This webinar is intended for attorneys involved in  Inter Party Review (IPR) procedures at USPTO PTAB, but might be of interest for prior art serches as well.  According AIA's 35 U.S.C. 311 (b), invalidity challenges in IPR "could be raised under section 102 or 103 and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications." In cited above PTAB precedential opinion "the Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) concludes that, at institution [of IPR], a petitioner must identify with particularity sufficient evidence to establish a reasonable likelihood that an asserted reference was publicly accessible before the critical date of the challenged patent and thus qualifies as a printed publication..  The POP further clarifies that there is no presumption in ... favor of finding that a reference is a printed publication" (AIPLA Summary Dec. 23, 2019). For more details, see the  POP decision IPR2018-01039, Paper 29  and some other documents from  the docket IPR2018-01039  (Patent owner Preliminary Response (Paper 10. pp.4-22), Petitioner's Request for Rehearing (Paper 10, p.3-8), Petitioner's Brief In Response To POP Review Order (Paper 17, pp. 8-13), Brief of Amicus Curiae -AIPLA (Paper 19,  p.2-3.8-9 [Sec. II,VI]), etc.).

    Last modified: 23 Jun 2020 7:20 PM | Anonymous member

© 2020 The Patent Information Users Group, Inc.   

Mailing Address:  40 E. Main St., #1438

Newark, DE  19711

Phone: +1 (302) 660-3275   Fax: +1 (302) 660-3276



Follow PIUG:  


Go to PIUG wiki

Notice on use of PIUG name and logo:  

No one may use the PIUG name or logo for any promotional or commercial purpose or any other purpose without the prior written consent of the PIUG Board of Directors.  

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software