Log in

Patent Information Users Group, Inc.

The International Society for Patent Information Professionals

Log in

Patent Information Users Group, Inc.  The International Society for Patent Information Professionals

  • Home
  • Open Letter to OED
  • Home
  • Open Letter to OED

Open Letter to OED

  • 10 May 2021 9:01 PM
    Reply # 10463557 on 10461058

    Thank you for replying Frazer.  It is true this applies only to US based patent information professionals.  I like the QPIP exam but when it was being debated I argued that it was putting the cart before the horse,  Recognition by the govt that the function is valuable would be the horse.  Also, I chose not to grandfather in when that option was available because of the tech requirement.  Neither Japan nor Canada have a tech requirement to practice patent law so why should QPIP for searchers.


  • 10 May 2021 7:45 PM
    Reply # 10463173 on 10461058

    Hi Robert

    Being based in Australia means that I can't co-sign as I'm not really affected, but I do appreciate what you've written.

    I think the idea of a second roster is a good one, and the profession has already taken some steps towards formalising what we do with the QPIP qualification which goes beyond mere coursework, and considers and tests our unique skills.



  • 10 May 2021 1:10 PM
    Message # 10461058

    Hello again members,

    I've been silent for awhile but that is due to the turmoil that the Country has experienced at the national level the past four year.  Overt that time Congress and the PTO have been silent on patent reform.  That is now changing.  Patrick Leahy has resumed his former position as Chairman of the Senate Intellectual Property Committee and he has said the patent quality will again be his focus. 

    Last month the Patent Office through the Office of Enrollment and Discipline put out a Request for Comments regarding the General Requirement Bulletin (GRB).  This request is yet another opportunity to advance the search profession.

    I've argued for a long time that that the GBR is the biggest obstacle to the development of our profession because the GRB directly tethers what we do to the patent attorney. 

    Comments are due on  5/24/2021.  I am circulating this letter among my colleagues who are not PIUG members and am getting positive feedback.  I am posting the letter here today in the event any PIUG members who are intellectual property researchers would like to cosign.

    Thank you


    1 file
    Last modified: 10 May 2021 5:04 PM | Anonymous

In this Section:

PIUG - Patent Information User Group, Inc.

Mailing Address:  
40 E. Main St., #1438
Newark, DE  19711

Phone: +1 (302) 660-3275   
Fax: +1 (302) 660-3276


Notice on use of PIUG name and logo:  

No one may use the PIUG name or logo for any promotional or commercial purpose or any other purpose without the prior written consent of the PIUG Board of Directors.  

Antitrust Policy | Bylaws  |  Copyright and Disclaimer

© 2023 The Patent Information Users Group, Inc.

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software